PROMETEA Empowering Women Engineers in Industrial and Academic Research

Prometea participants – 13 countries, 11 languages Project Coordinator: Dr. Yvonne Pourrat, Conference of the Heads of French Engineering Schools, Paris AUSTRIA: University of Klagenfurt CHILE: Centro de Estudios de la Mujer FINLAND: University of Helsinki FRANCE: Ecole Normale Supérieure de Cachan, Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Lyon, Egalité des Chances dans les Etudes et la Profession d’Ingénieur en Europe GERMANY: University of Wuppertal, Consulting Engineers Hoeborn GREECE: University of Aegean LITHUANIA: Siauliai University RUSSIA: Orel State Technical University SLOVAKIA:Technical University of Kosice SPAIN: Centre d’Estudis Dona i Societat SWEDEN: Uppsala University SERBIA: The Mihailo Pupin Institute UK: The University of Edinburgh INDUSTRY: Schlumberger

VAD? Kvinnors karriärvägar Arbetsplatskulturer Kvinnor och excellence i forskning Goda exempel på arbetsmiljöer Kvinnor som lyckats

HUR? I VARJE LAND Nationell statistik 2 arbetsplatser olika sektorer –Fokusgrupp med kvinnor –Fokusgrupp med män –Intervjuer med 2 kvinnor 2 Intervjuer med kvinnor som gjort karriärbyte 2 intervjuer med kvinnor i toppositioner Vissa länder: intervjuer på arbetsplats med bra jämställdhetspolicy

Att lära sig EU-språk Det är styrd och kontrollerad forskning och projekten ska vara minutiöst planerade –Work packages –Deliverables 26 deliverables/2 år

Workpackage Leading Partner WP1: Coordination CDEFI WP2: Methodology ENS-Cachan WP3: Gendered dynamics of engineers careers in engineering and technology research UNIKLU WP4: Gendering in organisational cultures BUW WP5: Gendering of excellence in engineering and technology research UH.UCAS WP6: Identification and evaluation of good practice UEDINUEDIN and CEDISCEDIS WP7: Transversal integrating analysis and interpretation CEDIS WP8: Dissemination and awareness raising TUKE WP9: Review and assessment CDEFI

Review and assessment - To set up quality procedures: After identifying the main processes in the research course of action with the help of partners, those processes will be clearly and precisely described in the quality manual. The next step will be the implementation of the quality manual and the measure of the differences between reality and the written procedure all along the project. A specific part of the Official reports (Year 1 and 2) will be devoted to reporting on the conformity to quality procedures. - To implement operational objectives measurements: After translating project objectives into project operational goals and objectives, those operationnal goals will be described in the quality manual with measurement procedures. Then the WP8 will measure how they are achieved or not by the consortium. A specific part of the Official reports (Year 1 and 2) will be devoted to reporting on achieving those operational goals. - To review and assess project success: Continuous review and monitoring of quality procedures and goal achievements will be ensured by the WP9. WP9 will inform the coordination about progress, and warn coordination about possible risks for the project. Under certain circumstances, WP9 will propose alternative solution, remediation or a revision of the quality manual, if necessary. At the end of the project WP9 will assess the overall quality of the project and the project success. All this will be reported in Official Reports.

Vad jag tänker på innan jag hoppar på nästa projekt Små och mellanstora projekt är bäst Arbeta helst med partners du känner till –Särskilt om du ska ansvara för deras arbete Var inte överambitiös Administrativ support är A och O!!!

Varför hoppa på en till …eller kanske t.o.m. koordinera Forskningsmässigt intressant –Både skillnader och likheter belysta i råmaterial Kan resultera i bra publikationer Relativt välbetalt Nätverk – socialt – resor