Ladda ner presentationen
Presentation laddar. Vänta.
Publicerades avMattias Andreasson
1
Genus, vetenskap och Peer Review
2
Begrepp ● Nepotism ● Metaforer ● Värderingar och observationer
4
Peer review Granskning baserad på neutralitet Universalism: vad, inte vem. “Vittne”: garantera objektivitet. Socialt system: präglat av andra sociala system. 1600-talets “peer” var (nästan) uteslutande en man.
6
Wennerås & Wold (1997) * MRC applications review * Equal productivity, lower scores for women * 'Friendship bonus', affiliation * Undermining of peer review system?
7
Metaphors and science * Practical and pedagogical tool of science * Influenced by historical/social aspects Martin 1996 * Difference in metaphors of the reproductive process * Larger cultural metaphors move into science * Integrated to a 'thought style' * Prevents new mutually active research?
8
Longino 2005 ● Process vs. innehåll ● Feministiska värderingar i en värderingsfri vetenskap? ● Emot feministiskt 'innehåll' (content) ● Vetenskap som praktik/process ● Constitutive/internal vs. Contextual/external ● Underdeterminering
9
● “I want to suggest that we focus on science as a practice rather than content, as a process rather than product, hence, not on feminist science, but on doing science as a feminist” (p. 2). Longino 2005
Liknande presentationer
© 2024 SlidePlayer.se Inc.
All rights reserved.