Presentation laddar. Vänta.

Presentation laddar. Vänta.

WG D – feedback WFD reporting - SWEDEN

Liknande presentationer


En presentation över ämnet: "WG D – feedback WFD reporting - SWEDEN"— Presentationens avskrift:

1 WG D – feedback WFD reporting - SWEDEN
Niklas Holmgren, Vice Director The Competent Authority of South Baltic River Basin District, Sweden

2 First cycle done! All RBD hearings done 1st September
Management plans decided December Released all envelopes to ReportNet by 19th March

3 Technical aspects A reporting tool for the national WISE system (called WISS) was developed Expensive investments – useful for future reporting (Floods and Marine Directive upcoming) Specific functionality for WFD reporting (imports from excel, validation checks, open interface for involved MS authorities)

4

5 Inte använt kommissionens verktyg utan eget nationellt
Stor kostnad - men långsiktigt korrekt? Har fungerat bra - buggar - men har rättats ut - lite med tanke på hur stort systemet är HelpDesk - mycket hjälpsamma - för det mesta väldigt snabbt. Confidence - I första hand baserat på metoder - då statistiskt analys - men om inte - ange vad den är baserad på. Intercalibration - done for status and quality factor men saknas för Impacts och Pressure. Där faller POM vid EU jämförelse.

6 COM tools and HelpDesk Quick response time from Helpdesk
Adequate documentation Tools – several times misconfigured but quickly fixed. Data model came late in our process – ½ year earlier more helpful

7 Costs WFD reporting 2008-2010 Database development: 200 000 €
Collecting data specific reporting: Water Authorities hours: € (40 persons involved) SEPA: 500 hours: € Geological Survey: 500 hours: € Hydrological Institute: hours: € TOTAL: €

8 Mercury in fish >EQS in Priority Substances Directive for all surface water bodies in Sweden All not good chemical status!

9 Intercalibration needed – example Significant Impacts
Eutrophication – agriculture >4 kg/km2 total Phosphorus annual anthropogenic discharge.

10 MS separate methods – example Ecological status Confidence - Coast
High: >3 Bio QE Medium: 2 Bio QE Low: 1 Bio QE, >1 Physico-Chem QE or Expert judgement

11 Thanks for your attention!


Ladda ner ppt "WG D – feedback WFD reporting - SWEDEN"

Liknande presentationer


Google-annonser